Triple
T6752770
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Max Wertheimer |
E154378
|
entity |
| Predicate | conceptInvented |
P201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | phi phenomenon |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: phi phenomenon | Statement: [Max Wertheimer, conceptInvented, phi phenomenon]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conceptInvented Context triple: [Max Wertheimer, conceptInvented, phi phenomenon]
-
A.
wasInventedBy
Indicates that something (typically an object, concept, or process) was created or brought into existence by a particular inventor or originator.
-
B.
invention
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of another entity, typically a device, method, or idea.
-
C.
inventionType
Indicates the specific category or kind of invention that characterizes the relationship between an invention and its type.
-
D.
notableInventor
Indicates that the subject is a well-known or historically significant inventor of the object.
-
E.
introducedConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880fd5808190be684854081e27dd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d327e37081909d576e6eff9eec97 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d09227108190b253b91967831a85 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:11 p.m.