Triple

T6747757
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject House of Lords (as a life peer’s wife) E154260 entity
Predicate relatedStatus P59172 FINISHED
Object spouse of a member of Parliament LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: spouse of a member of Parliament | Statement: [House of Lords (as a life peer’s wife), relatedStatus, spouse of a member of Parliament]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedStatus
Context triple: [House of Lords (as a life peer’s wife), relatedStatus, spouse of a member of Parliament]
  • A. associatedStatus
    Indicates that one entity is linked to or characterized by a particular status or condition.
  • B. associatedPeopleStatus chosen
    Indicates the role, condition, or standing of people who are connected or linked to a given entity or event.
  • C. relatedType
    Indicates that one entity is connected to another through a specified type or category of relationship.
  • D. laterRelationWith
    Indicates that one entity stands in a temporal relationship to another such that it occurs or exists at a later time than the other.
  • E. relatedTo
    Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6880ef37881909268a5a7299b9293 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d1d785dc81909c033084d2068568 completed March 27, 2026, 6:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d09067a0819087ed6c820f4699f8 completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:11 p.m.