Triple

T6745293
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Parker Harris E154194 entity
Predicate hasLeadershipArea P49097 FINISHED
Object technology strategy at Salesforce LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: technology strategy at Salesforce | Statement: [Parker Harris, hasLeadershipArea, technology strategy at Salesforce]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLeadershipArea
Context triple: [Parker Harris, hasLeadershipArea, technology strategy at Salesforce]
  • A. hasLieutenancyArea
    Indicates that an entity falls within, is administered by, or is associated with a specific lieutenancy area (a ceremonial or administrative jurisdiction).
  • B. areaOfAuthority chosen
    Indicates the domain, region, or scope within which an entity has official power, control, or responsibility.
  • C. governanceArea
    Indicates the geographic or jurisdictional area over which an entity has governing authority or responsibility.
  • D. hasLandmarkArea
    Indicates that a specified area is designated as the landmark area associated with a particular entity or location.
  • E. hasCivilArea
    Indicates that an administrative or political entity encompasses or is associated with a specific civil (local administrative) area.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6880ef37881909268a5a7299b9293 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d1b74ae081908575c4e47c0ef297 completed March 27, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d09067a0819087ed6c820f4699f8 completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.