Triple
T6740039
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cry Cry Cry |
E154053
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVocalTimbre |
P29850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rich baritone |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rich baritone | Statement: [Cry Cry Cry, hasVocalTimbre, rich baritone]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVocalTimbre Context triple: [Cry Cry Cry, hasVocalTimbre, rich baritone]
-
A.
hasVocalForces
Indicates that an entity involves or employs vocal performers or vocal parts as a contributing force.
-
B.
hasVocals
Indicates that the subject includes or features vocal elements, such as singing or spoken voice, rather than being purely instrumental or non-vocal.
-
C.
hasNotableVocalType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific, noteworthy type or quality of vocalization or voice.
-
D.
vocalizationCharacteristic
chosen
Indicates how an entity’s vocal sounds are characterized, such as their quality, style, or distinctive acoustic features.
-
E.
hasVocalPerformanceBy
Indicates that a vocal performance in a work or recording is performed by a specified person or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880d84d8819095d19de2295f26ac |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d187c8788190b9fc1ebc9a66a520 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d09067a0819087ed6c820f4699f8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.