Triple
T6737228
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court |
E153985
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesCase |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case)
Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938) is a United States Supreme Court administrative law decision from the Hughes Court era that addressed the scope of federal regulatory authority and procedural requirements in disputes involving a railway company.
|
E615014
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case) | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case) Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case)]
-
A.
Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company
Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company was one of the 1883 U.S. Supreme Court decisions collectively known as the Civil Rights Cases, which limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
-
B.
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. is a landmark 1928 New York Court of Appeals case, authored by Judge Benjamin Cardozo, that established the modern American doctrine of proximate cause and foreseeability in negligence law.
-
C.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
-
D.
Morgan v. Virginia
Morgan v. Virginia was a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down state laws mandating racial segregation on interstate buses, laying important groundwork for later civil rights actions.
-
E.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case) Triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case)]
Generated description
Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938) is a United States Supreme Court administrative law decision from the Hughes Court era that addressed the scope of federal regulatory authority and procedural requirements in disputes involving a railway company.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938 administrative law case, not 1946 transportation case) Target entity description: Morgan v. Virginia Railway Co. (1938) is a United States Supreme Court administrative law decision from the Hughes Court era that addressed the scope of federal regulatory authority and procedural requirements in disputes involving a railway company.
-
A.
Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company
Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company was one of the 1883 U.S. Supreme Court decisions collectively known as the Civil Rights Cases, which limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
-
B.
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. is a landmark 1928 New York Court of Appeals case, authored by Judge Benjamin Cardozo, that established the modern American doctrine of proximate cause and foreseeability in negligence law.
-
C.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
-
D.
Morgan v. Virginia
Morgan v. Virginia was a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down state laws mandating racial segregation on interstate buses, laying important groundwork for later civil rights actions.
-
E.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880d84d8819095d19de2295f26ac |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d1850a288190aa7e647fefbb0ede |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c70b0b97248190bf6bac160fe3d45b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:56 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c70bb0714c819094e80a2dfc960c99 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c70c51e0148190be64afb56690b34f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.