Triple

T6737222
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court E153985 entity
Predicate includesCase P1393 FINISHED
Object United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. E140389 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.]
  • A. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. chosen
    United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
  • B. United States v. Kagama
    United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
  • C. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • D. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • E. Powell v. McCormack
    Powell v. McCormack is a landmark 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s power to exclude a duly elected member, holding that it could not refuse to seat Adam Clayton Powell Jr. when he met all constitutional qualifications.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6880d84d8819095d19de2295f26ac completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d1850a288190aa7e647fefbb0ede completed March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c70b09b97c8190a5a538571b6909f0 completed March 27, 2026, 10:56 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.