Triple
T6737219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court |
E153985
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesCase |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | De Jonge v. Oregon |
E176633
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: De Jonge v. Oregon | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, De Jonge v. Oregon]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: De Jonge v. Oregon Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, De Jonge v. Oregon]
-
A.
De Jonge v. Oregon
chosen
De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
-
B.
Alden v. Maine
Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
-
C.
Oregon v. Elstad
Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
-
D.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
-
E.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880d84d8819095d19de2295f26ac |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d1850a288190aa7e647fefbb0ede |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c70b09b97c8190a5a538571b6909f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.