Triple
T6737215
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court |
E153985
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesCase |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
|
E615007
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.]
-
A.
Hudgens v. NLRB
Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
-
B.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
-
C.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. is a landmark 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly defined "gross income" under the Internal Revenue Code to include punitive damages and other undeniable accessions to wealth.
-
D.
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when an employer’s unsuccessful but reasonably based lawsuit against a union can be treated as an unfair labor practice under federal labor law.
-
E.
Hague v. CIO
Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. Triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.]
Generated description
National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. Target entity description: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
-
A.
Hudgens v. NLRB
Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
-
B.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
-
C.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. is a landmark 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly defined "gross income" under the Internal Revenue Code to include punitive damages and other undeniable accessions to wealth.
-
D.
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when an employer’s unsuccessful but reasonably based lawsuit against a union can be treated as an unfair labor practice under federal labor law.
-
E.
Hague v. CIO
Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880d84d8819095d19de2295f26ac |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d1850a288190aa7e647fefbb0ede |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c70b09b97c8190a5a538571b6909f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:56 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c70bda97f08190bc6dab7177341876 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c70c51e0148190be64afb56690b34f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:10 p.m.