Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) | Statement: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)]

Target entity: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)
Context triple: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)]

• A. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
  Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
• B. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
  Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering using the federal form.
• C. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
  Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited Congress’s power to subject non-consenting states to lawsuits in federal court, reinforcing state sovereign immunity.
• D. De Canas v. Bica
  De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
• E. Bridges v. California
  Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)
Triple: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)]

California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by limiting state regulation of gaming activities on Native American reservations.

Target entity: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)
Target entity description: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by limiting state regulation of gaming activities on Native American reservations.

• A. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
  Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
• B. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
  Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering using the federal form.
• C. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
  Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited Congress’s power to subject non-consenting states to lawsuits in federal court, reinforcing state sovereign immunity.
• D. De Canas v. Bica
  De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
• E. Bridges v. California
  Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
• F. None of above. chosen