Triple
T670722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1976 Portuguese Constitution |
E12963
|
entity |
| Predicate | providesForConstitutionalReview |
P14660
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Constitutional Court
The Constitutional Court is Portugal’s highest judicial body responsible for overseeing the constitutionality of laws and ensuring that legislation and state actions comply with the Portuguese Constitution.
|
E83641
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Constitutional Court | Statement: [1976 Portuguese Constitution, providesForConstitutionalReview, Constitutional Court]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitutional Court Context triple: [1976 Portuguese Constitution, providesForConstitutionalReview, Constitutional Court]
-
A.
Constitutional Court of Korea
The Constitutional Court of Korea is South Korea’s highest court for constitutional review, responsible for adjudicating the constitutionality of laws, resolving disputes over state powers, and protecting fundamental rights.
-
B.
People’s Supreme Court
The People’s Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Cuba, overseeing the administration of justice and interpreting national law within the country’s socialist legal system.
-
C.
Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation
The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation is Mexico’s highest federal court and ultimate judicial authority, responsible for interpreting the Constitution and overseeing the country’s judiciary.
-
D.
Constitutional Court of South Africa
The Constitutional Court of South Africa is the country’s highest court on constitutional matters, responsible for interpreting and upholding the Constitution and protecting fundamental rights.
-
E.
Supreme Court of Japan
The Supreme Court of Japan is the nation’s apex judicial body, responsible for final appeals and constitutional review within Japan’s legal system.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Constitutional Court Triple: [1976 Portuguese Constitution, providesForConstitutionalReview, Constitutional Court]
Generated description
The Constitutional Court is Portugal’s highest judicial body responsible for overseeing the constitutionality of laws and ensuring that legislation and state actions comply with the Portuguese Constitution.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitutional Court Target entity description: The Constitutional Court is Portugal’s highest judicial body responsible for overseeing the constitutionality of laws and ensuring that legislation and state actions comply with the Portuguese Constitution.
-
A.
Constitutional Court of Korea
The Constitutional Court of Korea is South Korea’s highest court for constitutional review, responsible for adjudicating the constitutionality of laws, resolving disputes over state powers, and protecting fundamental rights.
-
B.
People’s Supreme Court
The People’s Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Cuba, overseeing the administration of justice and interpreting national law within the country’s socialist legal system.
-
C.
Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation
The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation is Mexico’s highest federal court and ultimate judicial authority, responsible for interpreting the Constitution and overseeing the country’s judiciary.
-
D.
Constitutional Court of South Africa
The Constitutional Court of South Africa is the country’s highest court on constitutional matters, responsible for interpreting and upholding the Constitution and protecting fundamental rights.
-
E.
Supreme Court of Japan
The Supreme Court of Japan is the nation’s apex judicial body, responsible for final appeals and constitutional review within Japan’s legal system.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesForConstitutionalReview Context triple: [1976 Portuguese Constitution, providesForConstitutionalReview, Constitutional Court]
-
A.
judicialReviewBy
Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
-
B.
convenedUnderConstitution
Indicates that an assembly, body, or proceeding was formally brought into existence and organized according to the rules and authority of a specific constitution.
-
C.
containsConstitutionalCourt
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes or has within it a constitutional court as part of its structure or jurisdiction.
-
D.
constitutionalContext
Indicates that something occurs, is interpreted, or is evaluated within the framework, principles, or provisions of a constitution.
-
E.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493355dec819098d4244b2fa34885 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a1b3682c8190a9b9a454480c3446 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a5c39f3e1481908f395cdb19cfd2fc |
completed | March 2, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69a5c42d4a0481908af4a71b4625c130 |
completed | March 2, 2026, 5:09 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69a5ce16df088190850a3b851558eba8 |
completed | March 2, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d1a16c48190af89e3b078a4957e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.