Triple

T6701278
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minami Kojima E152882 entity
Predicate nearbyResourcePotential P72516 FINISHED
Object possible hydrocarbon resources in surrounding waters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: possible hydrocarbon resources in surrounding waters | Statement: [Minami Kojima, nearbyResourcePotential, possible hydrocarbon resources in surrounding waters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nearbyResourcePotential
Context triple: [Minami Kojima, nearbyResourcePotential, possible hydrocarbon resources in surrounding waters]
  • A. nearbyTo
    Indicates that one entity is located close in distance or position to another entity.
  • B. nearbyLocation
    Indicates that one location is situated close to another location in physical space.
  • C. nearbyEnvironment
    Indicates that an entity is located in or affected by the immediate surrounding conditions or context of another entity.
  • D. nearbyRole
    Indicates that one role is spatially close to or within a short distance of another role.
  • E. nearbyFrontier
    Indicates that one entity is located close to a boundary or frontier region associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68807adbc8190b8632df42b39eda0 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d16897e48190b43eda2206b14d6a completed March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d089c7488190a00853fb12f53b2a completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6d1668a7c8190ae93951f9ba2df10 completed March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:05 p.m.