Triple
T6698934
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Livingston F.C. |
E152824
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectToJurisdiction |
P808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Scottish football authorities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Scottish football authorities | Statement: [Livingston F.C., subjectToJurisdiction, Scottish football authorities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToJurisdiction Context triple: [Livingston F.C., subjectToJurisdiction, Scottish football authorities]
-
A.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
B.
intendedJurisdiction
Indicates the legal or geographic area over which something (such as a law, policy, or authority) is meant to have power or apply.
-
C.
supportsJurisdiction
Indicates that one jurisdiction provides backing, authority, or legal support for the actions, decisions, or existence of another jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasJurisdictionOver
chosen
Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
-
E.
heldForJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity is being detained or kept in custody specifically for legal or jurisdictional reasons by a particular authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68807adbc8190b8632df42b39eda0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d16897e48190b43eda2206b14d6a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d089c7488190a00853fb12f53b2a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:05 p.m.