Triple
T669370
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution of Greece |
E12936
|
entity |
| Predicate | amendmentProcedureRequires |
P6723
|
FINISHED |
| Object | enhanced parliamentary majority |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: enhanced parliamentary majority | Statement: [Constitution of Greece, amendmentProcedureRequires, enhanced parliamentary majority]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: amendmentProcedureRequires Context triple: [Constitution of Greece, amendmentProcedureRequires, enhanced parliamentary majority]
-
A.
amendmentRequires
chosen
Indicates that a particular amendment is necessary or must be applied in relation to another item, document, or condition.
-
B.
amendmentProcedureDefinedIn
Indicates that the process or rules for making amendments to something are specified or established within a particular source or document.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
amendmentCount
Indicates the number of amendments that have been made to a given item, document, or entity.
-
E.
constitutionalChange
Indicates a formal modification, addition, or removal of provisions within a constitution or foundational legal framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493355dec819098d4244b2fa34885 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49ffbe09881909b547a52a6b34c7f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d18942c819083b3d1887e505900 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.