Triple
T6693635
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dallas urban area |
E152689
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSuburb |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Seagoville |
E27603
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Seagoville | Statement: [Dallas urban area, hasSuburb, Seagoville]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Seagoville Context triple: [Dallas urban area, hasSuburb, Seagoville]
-
A.
Seagoville
chosen
Seagoville is a small city in North Texas that functions as a suburban community within the greater Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
-
B.
Wimberley
Wimberley is a small, scenic town in central Texas known for its picturesque Hill Country landscapes, swimming holes, and artsy, tourist-friendly downtown.
-
C.
Corryton
Corryton is an unincorporated community in northeastern Knox County, Tennessee, situated within the Knoxville metropolitan area.
-
D.
Navasota, Texas
Navasota, Texas is a small city in Grimes County that serves as a historic railroad and commercial hub within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
-
E.
Balch Springs
Balch Springs is a suburban city in the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area in northeastern Texas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880687b08190805278b504d1c92c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6b1955e448190adbfed7dc28f8c52 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c70af2ede08190821fd599a3bfc879 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:05 p.m.