Triple

T6669830
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Polish local government reforms of 1998 E151696 entity
Predicate followedEarlierReform P72378 FINISHED
Object Polish local government reform of 1990 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polish local government reform of 1990 | Statement: [Polish local government reforms of 1998, followedEarlierReform, Polish local government reform of 1990]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followedEarlierReform
Context triple: [Polish local government reforms of 1998, followedEarlierReform, Polish local government reform of 1990]
  • A. createdByReform
    Indicates that something came into existence or was established as a direct result of a reform or reform process.
  • B. replacedInReform
    Indicates that one entity was substituted or superseded by another as part of a formal reform or restructuring process.
  • C. scriptAfterReform
    Indicates that one script or writing system is used after a reform or modification has been applied to another script.
  • D. lastReform
    Indicates the most recent reform or change that was applied to an entity, typically linking the entity to its latest reform event or version.
  • E. subjectToReformBy
    Indicates that an entity is undergoing or designated for changes, improvements, or restructuring carried out by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687f71fc081909dbd45d6377f6045 completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6ce738fe88190a5557900efeec7ec completed March 27, 2026, 6:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6ad09974c81908784300ae218961f completed March 27, 2026, 4:15 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6ce72809c8190be85f6e42ca1c8ea completed March 27, 2026, 6:37 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:02 p.m.