Triple
T6657202
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Community Action Agency |
E151375
|
entity |
| Predicate | seeksFundingFrom |
P72130
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal sources |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal sources | Statement: [Community Action Agency, seeksFundingFrom, federal sources]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seeksFundingFrom Context triple: [Community Action Agency, seeksFundingFrom, federal sources]
-
A.
fundedBy
Indicates that an entity receives financial support or resources from another entity.
-
B.
funderOf
Indicates that one entity provides financial support or funding for another entity, project, or activity.
-
C.
possibleAdditionalFunding
Indicates that there is a potential for securing or providing further financial resources beyond what has already been allocated or committed.
-
D.
fundingContext
Indicates the circumstances, purpose, or conditions under which funding is provided or used in a given relationship or action.
-
E.
fundingComponent
Indicates that one entity serves as a financial contributor or funding source for another entity or activity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687f5fac48190a09e4838d9c6b45d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6cc9d53848190ac75523c157249c6 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6ad071b0081909b96dd4b93414bd1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6cc988c0081909d22b86ca299331c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:01 p.m.