Triple

T6655324
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Order of Friars Minor Conventual E150926 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfVows P72121 FINISHED
Object solemn vows LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solemn vows | Statement: [Order of Friars Minor Conventual, hasTypeOfVows, solemn vows]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfVows
Context triple: [Order of Friars Minor Conventual, hasTypeOfVows, solemn vows]
  • A. hasVow
    Indicates that one entity has made or is bound by a formal vow or promise in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. vowsTo
    Indicates a commitment or solemn promise made by one entity to another to perform, uphold, or refrain from specific actions.
  • C. hasTypeOfVoters
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular category or kind of voters.
  • D. vowStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a commitment or promise made between entities, such as whether it is active, fulfilled, or broken.
  • E. hasDependentVowels
    Indicates that a writing system or script uses vowel signs that are attached to or depend on consonant characters rather than standing alone as independent letters.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687f2c9508190a60b9aad31d3f358 completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6cc9d53848190ac75523c157249c6 completed March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6ad071b0081909b96dd4b93414bd1 completed March 27, 2026, 4:15 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6cc988c0081909d22b86ca299331c completed March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:01 p.m.