Triple

T663958
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide E12817 entity
Predicate citedInCase P4420 FINISHED
Object Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ) E76548 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ) | Statement: [Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, citedInCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ)
Context triple: [Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, citedInCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ)]
  • A. Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) chosen
    Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) is a landmark International Court of Justice judgment that addressed state responsibility for genocide during the Bosnian War, including the Srebrenica massacre, and clarified key obligations under the Genocide Convention.
  • B. Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
    Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
  • C. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
    The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia was a UN court established to prosecute individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s.
  • D. State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
    The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a short-lived South Slavic state established in 1918 from former Austro-Hungarian territories, which soon united with the Kingdom of Serbia to form the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia).
  • E. Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bosnia and Herzegovina is a Balkan country in Southeastern Europe known for its complex post-Yugoslav history, diverse cultural and religious heritage, and capital city, Sarajevo.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citedInCase
Context triple: [Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, citedInCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ)]
  • A. citesAs
    Indicates that one entity references or acknowledges another as a source of information, authority, or evidence.
  • B. legalCitation chosen
    Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
  • C. citationBy
    Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
  • D. subsequentCitationIn
    Indicates that one work cites or references another work that appears later in a specified source or sequence.
  • E. stillCitedFor
    Indicates that a work or source continues to be referenced or relied upon as a citation after its original publication or use.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493355dec819098d4244b2fa34885 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49fd1f0ec819087003d30bbab2fa6 completed March 1, 2026, 8:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a5c398cc748190ab720263096064ef completed March 2, 2026, 5:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d16cff881908c8d2c3fe4d1d6fb completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.