Triple
T6624459
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chucunaque River |
E149759
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tuira River basin |
E236116
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tuira River basin | Statement: [Chucunaque River, partOf, Tuira River basin]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tuira River basin Context triple: [Chucunaque River, partOf, Tuira River basin]
-
A.
Tuira River
chosen
The Tuira River is one of the largest rivers in Panama, flowing through the Darién region before emptying into the Pacific Ocean.
-
B.
Tuirial River
The Tuirial River is a significant river in the northeastern Indian state of Mizoram, contributing to the region’s drainage, ecology, and local livelihoods.
-
C.
Ceira River
The Ceira River is a river in central Portugal that flows through the Coimbra District before joining the Mondego River.
-
D.
Dyle river basin
The Dyle river basin is a drainage area in central Belgium encompassing the Dyle River and its tributaries, including the region around towns such as La Hulpe.
-
E.
Oignin River
The Oignin River is a smaller watercourse in eastern France that feeds into the Ain River within the Rhône-Alpes region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687ed8a9c81908bb671717cb192ef |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6af7fc054819099a2e58cefd8fed7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:25 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c6f78f667c81908c2de74009c8e073 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:33 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:58 p.m.