Triple
T6607927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | British arbitration in the Beagle conflict |
E149164
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international legal process |
C1793
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: international legal process Context triple: [British arbitration in the Beagle conflict, instanceOf, international legal process]
-
A.
international legal case
An international legal case is a formal dispute between states, international organizations, or other cross-border parties that is adjudicated or arbitrated under international law by a recognized international court, tribunal, or dispute-resolution body.
-
B.
international legal mechanism
chosen
An international legal mechanism is a formal process, institution, or instrument established by states or international organizations to create, interpret, enforce, or resolve disputes about obligations under international law.
-
C.
international criminal proceeding
An international criminal proceeding is a formal legal process conducted by an international or hybrid court to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate individuals accused of serious crimes under international law, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
-
D.
international legal regime
An international legal regime is a structured set of principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures agreed upon by states and other actors to govern behavior and cooperation in a specific issue-area of international relations.
-
E.
international law journal
An international law journal is a scholarly periodical that publishes peer-reviewed articles, case notes, and commentary on legal issues, developments, and theories in public and private international law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687eaa7508190bb58ce2aa02039b3 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:57 p.m.