Triple

T660668
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject UPP E11745 entity
Predicate railroadReportingMarkStatus P12717 FINISHED
Object active LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: active | Statement: [UPP, railroadReportingMarkStatus, active]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: railroadReportingMarkStatus
Context triple: [UPP, railroadReportingMarkStatus, active]
  • A. historicalRecordStatus
    Indicates the status or condition of a record within a historical or archival context (e.g., active, archived, revised, or obsolete).
  • B. standardizationStatus
    Indicates the current stage or condition of an entity in a formal standardization process (e.g., proposed, under review, approved, deprecated).
  • C. statusIndicates
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • D. hasStatusLabel chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific status expressed as a human-readable label.
  • E. flagshipStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds the primary or most prominent position within a group, organization, or collection, often serving as its leading or representative example.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4932862a0819098be659c814e4981 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0f55f7481909e052a25bd12d455 completed March 1, 2026, 8:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d1406ec8190abf546549264c85d completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.