Triple
T6599920
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ceratotherium |
E148569
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMemberWithIUCNStatus |
P10920
|
FINISHED |
| Object | near threatened |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: near threatened | Statement: [Ceratotherium, hasMemberWithIUCNStatus, near threatened]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMemberWithIUCNStatus Context triple: [Ceratotherium, hasMemberWithIUCNStatus, near threatened]
-
A.
IUCNStatusSystem
Indicates the conservation status classification framework used to assign an IUCN threat category to a species or taxon.
-
B.
conservationStatus
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
-
C.
includesSpecies
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses one or more species as part of its composition or scope.
-
D.
previousIucnStatus
Indicates the conservation status an entity held in the IUCN Red List before its current or most recent assessment.
-
E.
wildlifeProtectionStatus
Indicates the level or type of legal or conservation protection currently applied to wildlife.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687e7b8688190811ffee72e096468 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6cc9c6cb0819084fec8e0beb430de |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6acfd17388190bd0bb8b2371e7df1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:56 p.m.