Triple
T6587426
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inagta Rinconada language |
E159260
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Aeta language |
C20210
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Aeta language Context triple: [Inagta Rinconada language, instanceOf, Aeta language]
-
A.
Misumalpan language
Misumalpan language is a small family of indigenous languages spoken primarily along the Atlantic coast of Nicaragua and neighboring regions, including Miskito, Sumo (Mayangna), and Matagalpan varieties.
-
B.
Agta language
chosen
Agta language is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken by the Agta (Aeta) hunter-gatherer communities of northeastern Luzon in the Philippines, characterized by significant dialectal variation and influence from neighboring Philippine languages.
-
C.
Miwok language
The Miwok language is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Miwok peoples of central California, known for their rich verb morphology and diverse dialects.
-
D.
Central Tano language
A Central Tano language is a member of the Tano branch of the Niger-Congo language family spoken primarily in Ghana and neighboring regions, characterized by tonal phonology and shared grammatical and lexical features with related Akanic and Guang languages.
-
E.
Zenati language
The Zenati language is a conceptual class representing a branch of Berber languages characterized by shared phonological, morphological, and lexical features that distinguish it from other Afroasiatic language groups.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688366ce8819083f8883983c0df92 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:55 p.m.