Triple
T6586049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Two Sevens Clash: The 30th Anniversary Edition |
E159226
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemastering |
P71635
|
FINISHED |
| Object | digitally remastered audio |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: digitally remastered audio | Statement: [Two Sevens Clash: The 30th Anniversary Edition, hasRemastering, digitally remastered audio]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemastering Context triple: [Two Sevens Clash: The 30th Anniversary Edition, hasRemastering, digitally remastered audio]
-
A.
remasteredVersion
Indicates that one entity is a newly produced, higher-quality audio or visual version of another original recording or release.
-
B.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
C.
hasRemake
Indicates that one work is a new version or recreation of an earlier existing work.
-
D.
containsRemixes
Indicates that one entity includes or is associated with remix versions of another entity.
-
E.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688366ce8819083f8883983c0df92 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6c07cdf048190945ca5810fb1de88 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6acfb462481909cb7aff5af4bca9d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6c07bb434819096ec3e3b966042a5 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:54 p.m.