Triple

T6569833
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Potoroidae E155403 entity
Predicate currentRangeTrend P5318 FINISHED
Object contracting LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contracting | Statement: [Potoroidae, currentRangeTrend, contracting]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: currentRangeTrend
Context triple: [Potoroidae, currentRangeTrend, contracting]
  • A. hasTrend chosen
    Indicates that something exhibits or is associated with a particular pattern of change or direction over time.
  • B. reversedTrendOf
    Indicates that one trend is the inverse or opposite-direction counterpart of another trend, such that when one increases or moves in a certain direction, the other correspondingly decreases or moves in the opposite direction.
  • C. closureTrend
    Indicates how the status or frequency of closures changes over time (e.g., increasing, decreasing, or stable).
  • D. trends
    Indicates that one entity exhibits a general direction of change or development over time in relation to another reference or context.
  • E. typicalRange
    Indicates the usual or expected range of values, conditions, or states within which something normally occurs or applies.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c688151254819080387f87deab8fa7 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6cc9c6cb0819084fec8e0beb430de completed March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6acf93cb48190b54f5dd6febd34dc completed March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.