Triple

T6565462
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tiny E153891 entity
Predicate hasIronicMeaning P71901 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Tiny, hasIronicMeaning, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIronicMeaning
Context triple: [Tiny, hasIronicMeaning, yes]
  • A. hasMeaningViaJohn
    Indicates that something possesses or conveys its meaning specifically through John as the interpretive or mediating agent.
  • B. possibleMeaning
    Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
  • C. hasMean
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular mean value or average.
  • D. hasLiteralMeaning
    Indicates that one entity expresses the direct, explicit meaning or sense of another entity (such as a word, phrase, or symbol).
  • E. logicalMeaning
    Indicates that one entity expresses, encodes, or conveys the logical content, implication, or formal meaning of another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6880cb35881909b763eb0125236b9 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6cc9c6cb0819084fec8e0beb430de completed March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6acf93cb48190b54f5dd6febd34dc completed March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6cc988c0081909d22b86ca299331c completed March 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:52 p.m.