Triple
T6561414
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Goodman–Martínez–Thompson correlation |
E153789
|
entity |
| Predicate | timePeriodOfRefinement |
P71818
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early 20th century |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 20th century | Statement: [Goodman–Martínez–Thompson correlation, timePeriodOfRefinement, early 20th century]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: timePeriodOfRefinement Context triple: [Goodman–Martínez–Thompson correlation, timePeriodOfRefinement, early 20th century]
-
A.
timePeriod
Indicates the specific span or interval of time during which an event, state, or relationship occurs or is valid.
-
B.
timePeriodAnalyzed
Indicates that a specified time period is the focus or scope of an analysis or evaluation.
-
C.
timePeriodProposed
Indicates that a specific time period has been suggested or put forward for consideration or adoption.
-
D.
timePeriodImplied
Indicates that a time period is inferred or implied by context rather than being explicitly specified.
-
E.
timePeriodCategory
Indicates the classification of a time period into a specific category or type (e.g., era, phase, or temporal grouping).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880cb35881909b763eb0125236b9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6c1b15d3481908ae66e3d7564b352 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 5:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6acf6d4148190914b19e9affd8c76 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6c1b007148190b5164d6d09584cdf |
completed | March 27, 2026, 5:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:52 p.m.