Triple
T6558719
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Earl Roberts |
E152518
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRankInBritishPeerage |
P3784
|
FINISHED |
| Object | earl |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: earl | Statement: [Earl Roberts, hasRankInBritishPeerage, earl]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRankInBritishPeerage Context triple: [Earl Roberts, hasRankInBritishPeerage, earl]
-
A.
rankInBritishPeerageSystem
chosen
Indicates the specific noble title or level an entity holds within the hierarchical structure of the British peerage system.
-
B.
hasPeerageType
Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a specific category or rank of peerage (noble title).
-
C.
rankRelativeToPeerage
Indicates how an entity’s hierarchical rank compares to that of a specified peer or peer group within a defined ranking system.
-
D.
typeOfPeerage
Indicates the specific rank or category within a system of peerage that a given title or noble status belongs to.
-
E.
peerageRankBelow
Indicates that one entity holds a lower rank or status in a peerage or nobility hierarchy than another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688058d6881908c19b309cc55dbfa |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6c1b15d3481908ae66e3d7564b352 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 5:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6acf6d4148190914b19e9affd8c76 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:52 p.m.