Triple
T6553834
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Suqian |
E152395
|
entity |
| Predicate | shortName |
P43
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Suqian |
E152395
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Suqian | Statement: [Suqian, shortName, Suqian]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Suqian Context triple: [Suqian, shortName, Suqian]
-
A.
Suqian
chosen
Suqian is a prefecture-level city in northern Jiangsu Province, China, known for its historical sites and growing industrial and agricultural economy.
-
B.
Yancheng
Yancheng is a coastal prefecture-level city in eastern China known for its wetlands, nature reserves, and rapidly developing economy.
-
C.
Changzhou
Changzhou is a major industrial and commercial city in Jiangsu Province, eastern China, known for its manufacturing base and location along the Yangtze River.
-
D.
Quzhou
Quzhou is a historic prefecture-level city in western Zhejiang Province, China, known as a regional transport hub with cultural heritage sites and a growing modern economy.
-
E.
Zhenjiang
Zhenjiang is a historic port city in eastern China known for its strategic location on the Yangtze River and its rich cultural and culinary heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688058d6881908c19b309cc55dbfa |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ae0847d88190b38f9d7dba0faae1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:19 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c6cb862e308190af1028c76484a1ea |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:51 p.m.