Triple
T6531353
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Table |
E152236
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsLegalRuling |
P36007
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rules on food permissible for Muslims |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rules on food permissible for Muslims | Statement: [The Table, containsLegalRuling, rules on food permissible for Muslims]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsLegalRuling Context triple: [The Table, containsLegalRuling, rules on food permissible for Muslims]
-
A.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
-
B.
hasLegalRelevanceIn
Indicates that something is legally significant, applicable, or has consequences within a specified legal context, case, or jurisdiction.
-
C.
hasRulingInFiqh
chosen
Indicates that a subject has an associated legal ruling or judgment within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh).
-
D.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
E.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688048ec8819093a47f7d332e12ec |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6adbcf820819097ca33a5fc14fd64 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c68abd9c7c819099e4fe8097cd1b28 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:46 p.m.