Triple

T652839
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bronze Age E11380 entity
Predicate hasCulturalDevelopment P16953 FINISHED
Object early law codes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early law codes | Statement: [Bronze Age, hasCulturalDevelopment, early law codes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCulturalDevelopment
Context triple: [Bronze Age, hasCulturalDevelopment, early law codes]
  • A. hasCulturalFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is characterized by a particular cultural element, attribute, or landmark.
  • B. hasCulturalExpression
    Indicates that an entity embodies, manifests, or is associated with a particular cultural form, practice, or expression.
  • C. hasCulturalRole
    Indicates that an entity fulfills or is assigned a specific function, position, or significance within a cultural, social, or traditional context.
  • D. hasCulturalCommunity
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, belongs to, or is part of a specific cultural community.
  • E. hasCulturalSignificance
    Indicates that something holds notable meaning, value, or importance within a particular culture or cultural context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f4a660c8190b887cb4da01ef7ae completed March 1, 2026, 8:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d1001088190aa7ca3c8f2ad0e32 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49dc0e6a08190b81d82a6f2571c41 completed March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.