Triple
T6528279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pepel |
E151360
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalFoodStaple |
P17103
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rice |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rice | Statement: [Pepel, traditionalFoodStaple, rice]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalFoodStaple Context triple: [Pepel, traditionalFoodStaple, rice]
-
A.
traditionalDish
Indicates that the object is a dish customarily prepared, eaten, or recognized within the subject’s cultural or regional tradition.
-
B.
traditionalCuisine
Indicates that an entity is associated with the customary or historically rooted style of cooking and food preparation characteristic of a particular culture, region, or community.
-
C.
traditionalAgriculturalProduct
Indicates that something is recognized as an agricultural product produced using long-established, customary methods and practices.
-
D.
regionOfCulinaryImportance
Indicates that a location is recognized for its significant culinary relevance, such as notable food traditions, specialties, or gastronomic culture.
-
E.
primaryFood
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or most important food source for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687f522748190b3058405553cdabd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ada9c8408190b1bc327985366be9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c68abbc7148190a8270d47fe10cc31 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:46 p.m.