Triple
T6523579
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trans–New Guinea languages |
E151246
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Papuan language family |
C19241
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Papuan language family Context triple: [Trans–New Guinea languages, instanceOf, Papuan language family]
-
A.
Papuan language
chosen
A Papuan language is any of the numerous non-Austronesian, non-Australian indigenous languages spoken primarily on the island of New Guinea and neighboring regions, representing several distinct and often unrelated language families.
-
B.
Malayo-Polynesian language
A Malayo-Polynesian language is a member of a large branch of the Austronesian language family spoken across Southeast Asia, Madagascar, and the Pacific islands, characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features.
-
C.
Austronesian language
An Austronesian language is any member of a large family of languages spoken from Madagascar across Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific to Easter Island, characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features tracing back to a common ancestral tongue.
-
D.
Austroasiatic language
An Austroasiatic language is a member of a large language family native to Southeast Asia and parts of South Asia, including languages such as Vietnamese, Khmer, and Mon.
-
E.
Oto-Manguean language
An Oto-Manguean language is a member of a large, diverse family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages, primarily spoken in Mexico, characterized by complex tonal systems and significant grammatical and phonological variation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687f522748190b3058405553cdabd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:45 p.m.