Triple

T6497145
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ekthesis E148785 entity
Predicate christologicalFormula P15107 FINISHED
Object one will in Christ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one will in Christ | Statement: [Ekthesis, christologicalFormula, one will in Christ]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: christologicalFormula
Context triple: [Ekthesis, christologicalFormula, one will in Christ]
  • A. hasChristologicalUse
    Indicates that something is used or interpreted in a way that relates specifically to the person, nature, or work of Christ within Christian theology.
  • B. incarnationOf
    Indicates that one entity is a concrete embodiment, manifestation, or earthly form of another, typically more abstract or divine, entity.
  • C. regardsJesusAs
    Indicates that one entity holds a particular view, attitude, or evaluation of Jesus as another entity.
  • D. theologicalConcept chosen
    Indicates that something is a religious or theological idea, doctrine, or principle within a belief system.
  • E. emphasizesAttributeOfChrist
    Indicates that something highlights, underscores, or draws special attention to a particular attribute or quality of Christ.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687e9ad288190bae5bcac9c8ac855 completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c69f386aa08190bfc8592a92ec6339 completed March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c68ab714908190aa7c2fbf64078e15 completed March 27, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:41 p.m.