Triple

T6496922
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fortunata y Jacinta E148780 entity
Predicate placeInLiterature P15594 FINISHED
Object classic of Spanish literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: classic of Spanish literature | Statement: [Fortunata y Jacinta, placeInLiterature, classic of Spanish literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: placeInLiterature
Context triple: [Fortunata y Jacinta, placeInLiterature, classic of Spanish literature]
  • A. inLiterature
    Indicates that a work, concept, or entity is mentioned, discussed, or represented within a piece of literature.
  • B. literaryWorkInStory
    Indicates that one literary work is referenced, featured, or embedded within the narrative of another story.
  • C. literarySource
    Indicates that one entity serves as the written or literary origin, reference, or basis for another entity.
  • D. literaryThemeInvolvement
    Indicates the involvement or presence of a particular literary theme within a work, passage, or character arc.
  • E. hasLiterarySignificance chosen
    Indicates that something holds notable importance, influence, or value within the realm of literature or literary studies.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687e9ad288190bae5bcac9c8ac855 completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c69f386aa08190bfc8592a92ec6339 completed March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c68ab714908190aa7c2fbf64078e15 completed March 27, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 1:41 p.m.