Triple
T6491902
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tehama County |
E148059
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plumas County |
E107361
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plumas County | Statement: [Tehama County, borders, Plumas County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Plumas County Context triple: [Tehama County, borders, Plumas County]
-
A.
Plumas County
chosen
Plumas County is a rural, mountainous county in northeastern California known for its forests, lakes, and outdoor recreation within the northern Sierra Nevada.
-
B.
Pecos County
Pecos County is a large, sparsely populated county in West Texas known for its desert landscapes, ranching, and oil and gas production.
-
C.
Eddy County
Eddy County is a county in southeastern New Mexico known for encompassing Carlsbad Caverns National Park and significant oil and gas production.
-
D.
Rio Grande County
Rio Grande County is a rural county in south-central Colorado, known for its agricultural communities and location within the high-altitude San Luis Valley.
-
E.
Conejos County
Conejos County is a rural county in southern Colorado known for its agricultural communities, historic Hispanic settlements, and location within the high-altitude San Luis Valley.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c009088f3081909cd467b05919de30 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06a9bf9208190b0957eda06ed3d65 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c65fdc835081909772f3a3aaee538f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:53 p.m.