Triple
T6478515
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Until the End of Time |
E146130
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsRemixes |
P71139
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Until the End of Time, containsRemixes, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsRemixes Context triple: [Until the End of Time, containsRemixes, true]
-
A.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
B.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
-
C.
hasRemixGenre
Indicates that a work or track has a remix version characterized by a particular musical genre.
-
D.
containsAdditionalTracksBeyond
Indicates that one entity includes more tracks or items than are present in another referenced set or version.
-
E.
notableRemixBy
Indicates that one creative work has a particularly recognized or significant remix created by a specified artist or entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fec7408190af7b146dc63d9750 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06a4d35f08190a94143367b1d45c5 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0673f6d48819080e10c85155c7195 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c06822f73081908e6bb9edecbe77a6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:51 p.m.