Triple
T6476336
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South West Surrey |
E146079
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBoundaryReviews |
P56146
|
FINISHED |
| Object | periodic reviews by Boundary Commission for England |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: periodic reviews by Boundary Commission for England | Statement: [South West Surrey, hasBoundaryReviews, periodic reviews by Boundary Commission for England]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBoundaryReviews Context triple: [South West Surrey, hasBoundaryReviews, periodic reviews by Boundary Commission for England]
-
A.
hasBoundaryReviewBody
chosen
Indicates that an entity has an associated body or authority responsible for reviewing or overseeing its boundaries.
-
B.
hasBoundaryCriterion
Indicates that something is associated with a specific rule or condition used to define or limit its boundary.
-
C.
hasReviewPeriod
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which it is subject to review or evaluation.
-
D.
hasBoundarySystem
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific boundary system that defines its limits or separation from its surroundings.
-
E.
hasReviewReception
Indicates that an entity has received a critical or evaluative review describing how it was received or perceived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fec7408190af7b146dc63d9750 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06a49b3bc8190ad80c6ca2dd15c68 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0673f6d48819080e10c85155c7195 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:51 p.m.