Triple
T6469592
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tupian |
E142313
|
entity |
| Predicate | wellKnownLanguage |
P42338
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Juruna language
The Juruna language is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Juruna (Yudjá) people of the Xingu region in Brazil.
|
E597887
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juruna language | Statement: [Tupian, wellKnownLanguage, Juruna language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Juruna language Context triple: [Tupian, wellKnownLanguage, Juruna language]
-
A.
Warao language
The Warao language is an indigenous language isolate spoken by the Warao people of northeastern Venezuela and nearby regions, particularly in the Orinoco Delta.
-
B.
Jarawa language
The Jarawa language is an endangered Ongan language spoken by the indigenous Jarawa people of the Andaman Islands in India.
-
C.
Terena language
The Terena language is an Arawakan indigenous language spoken primarily by the Terena people of Brazil’s Mato Grosso do Sul region.
-
D.
Munduruku language
The Munduruku language is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Munduruku people of the Amazon region in Brazil.
-
E.
Tapirapé language
Tapirapé is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Tapirapé people of Brazil, known for its complex morphology and endangered status.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Juruna language Triple: [Tupian, wellKnownLanguage, Juruna language]
Generated description
The Juruna language is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Juruna (Yudjá) people of the Xingu region in Brazil.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Juruna language Target entity description: The Juruna language is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Juruna (Yudjá) people of the Xingu region in Brazil.
-
A.
Warao language
The Warao language is an indigenous language isolate spoken by the Warao people of northeastern Venezuela and nearby regions, particularly in the Orinoco Delta.
-
B.
Jarawa language
The Jarawa language is an endangered Ongan language spoken by the indigenous Jarawa people of the Andaman Islands in India.
-
C.
Terena language
The Terena language is an Arawakan indigenous language spoken primarily by the Terena people of Brazil’s Mato Grosso do Sul region.
-
D.
Munduruku language
The Munduruku language is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Munduruku people of the Amazon region in Brazil.
-
E.
Tapirapé language
Tapirapé is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Tapirapé people of Brazil, known for its complex morphology and endangered status.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008d3bf4c8190bcf798c5ba9d6fb3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06a16272c81909313455002cd884d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c66382f9ac81908d9cb444ab596d04 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 11:01 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c6646fa43c819085338458113e5bf9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 11:05 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c664d154dc81908d48056d272c56fa |
completed | March 27, 2026, 11:06 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:50 p.m.