Triple
T6439183
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 6145 |
E129973
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRFCEditorURL |
P70632
|
FINISHED |
| Object | https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6145 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6145 | Statement: [RFC 6145, hasRFCEditorURL, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6145]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRFCEditorURL Context triple: [RFC 6145, hasRFCEditorURL, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6145]
-
A.
defaultEditorSince
Indicates the point in time since which a particular entity has been designated as the default editor for another entity or context.
-
B.
hasEditorType
Indicates that an entity has an associated kind or category of editor responsible for reviewing or modifying it.
-
C.
hasEditorScripting
Indicates that an entity provides or supports scripting capabilities specifically for editing or editor-related functionality.
-
D.
editorDraftURL
Indicates the URL where an editor can access and modify a draft version of the related item.
-
E.
editorName
Indicates the relationship that specifies the name of an editor associated with a given entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0084caac48190a7bc2ad8ba44536f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06965a5d48190a5860da9e22dc6e0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060f96980819091bab9335922a457 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0623e3cd48190929b0e3cba013909 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:45 p.m.