Triple
T6430062
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sutton's law |
E128156
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusOfQuote |
P18287
|
FINISHED |
| Object | apocryphal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: apocryphal | Statement: [Sutton's law, statusOfQuote, apocryphal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusOfQuote Context triple: [Sutton's law, statusOfQuote, apocryphal]
-
A.
hasQuotationStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a particular quotation-related state or condition (such as being quoted, unquoted, or having a specific quotation status).
-
B.
profitStatus
Indicates the financial performance state of an entity, such as whether it is operating at a profit, loss, or breaking even.
-
C.
valuationStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s assessed value within a valuation process (e.g., pending, active, finalized, or invalid).
-
D.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
E.
status
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00838de888190af2eec0b80495efa |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06923b12081908a09543450b88c24 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060f780b08190aa650b4d1fc51f21 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:44 p.m.