Triple
T6417909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carpenter v. United States |
E127874
|
entity |
| Predicate | originatingCourtDecision |
P19102
|
FINISHED |
| Object | affirmed in part and reversed in part |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: affirmed in part and reversed in part | Statement: [Carpenter v. United States, originatingCourtDecision, affirmed in part and reversed in part]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originatingCourtDecision Context triple: [Carpenter v. United States, originatingCourtDecision, affirmed in part and reversed in part]
-
A.
originatedInCourt
Indicates that a legal case, decision, or proceeding began or was first filed in a specified court.
-
B.
hasLowerCourtDecision
chosen
Indicates that a higher court case is associated with, or results from, a specific decision made by a lower court.
-
C.
originatingJurisdiction
Indicates the jurisdiction (such as a country, state, or legal authority) from which something originally comes or under whose laws it was first established.
-
D.
originatingStateCourt
Indicates the court in which a legal case or proceeding was originally filed or initiated.
-
E.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0083815208190a9b299b8e0640218 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c068eb6c988190b54de6182d0f490d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060f5d4e481909d1366190607b586 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:42 p.m.