Triple

T6409009
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Real-time Transport Control Protocol E127658 entity
Predicate predecessorRFC P70468 FINISHED
Object RFC 1889 E523056 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1889 | Statement: [Real-time Transport Control Protocol, predecessorRFC, RFC 1889]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1889
Context triple: [Real-time Transport Control Protocol, predecessorRFC, RFC 1889]
  • A. RFC 1889 chosen
    RFC 1889 was the original specification of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) for delivering audio and video over IP networks, later obsoleted by updated standards.
  • B. RFC 1869
    RFC 1869 is an early Internet standard that introduced the Extended Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (ESMTP) framework for adding optional extensions to SMTP.
  • C. RFC 1908
    RFC 1908 is an older Internet standards document related to network management that was later superseded by RFC 3410.
  • D. RFC 1939
    RFC 1939 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Post Office Protocol version 3 (POP3) used for retrieving email from a mail server.
  • E. RFC 1668
    RFC 1668 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1901 as the protocol specifications evolved.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: predecessorRFC
Context triple: [Real-time Transport Control Protocol, predecessorRFC, RFC 1889]
  • A. predecessor
    Indicates that one entity comes before another in an ordered sequence or succession.
  • B. predecessorName
    Indicates that the value is the name of an entity that directly precedes another in an ordered sequence or lineage.
  • C. predecessorStatus
    Indicates that one entity’s status is determined by, or directly follows from, the status of a preceding entity in a sequence or process.
  • D. predecessorFamily
    Indicates that one family is the earlier or ancestral family from which another family descends or follows.
  • E. predecessorVersion
    Indicates that one entity is an earlier or prior version in a version sequence relative to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0083723d88190b1e37b19df162c08 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c068cdf25881908d42a5d979637ad6 completed March 22, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c638b38c888190aa2433173db64c90 completed March 27, 2026, 7:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060f40ecc8190b1df17b96767675c completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c0623d23448190a75cf5d802fc0a02 completed March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:41 p.m.