Triple
T6404864
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Girlfriend (remix) |
E144153
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemixStatus |
P70444
|
FINISHED |
| Object | official remix |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: official remix | Statement: [Girlfriend (remix), hasRemixStatus, official remix]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemixStatus Context triple: [Girlfriend (remix), hasRemixStatus, official remix]
-
A.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
B.
hasRemixGenre
Indicates that a work or track has a remix version characterized by a particular musical genre.
-
C.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
-
D.
hasRemediationStatus
Indicates the current state or progress of remediation efforts applied to an identified issue, risk, or non-compliance.
-
E.
hasRemainsOf
Indicates that one entity physically contains, preserves, or is associated with the leftover physical traces or remnants of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008dc56fc81908d43ffcc11d73bdd |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c068b0950c819091169aa1a3be0e88 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060f40ecc8190b1df17b96767675c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0623d23448190a75cf5d802fc0a02 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:35 p.m.