Triple
T6396764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ħ |
E143960
|
entity |
| Predicate | isProportionalityFactorIn |
P70383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | E = ħω |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E = ħω | Statement: [ħ, isProportionalityFactorIn, E = ħω]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isProportionalityFactorIn Context triple: [ħ, isProportionalityFactorIn, E = ħω]
-
A.
isProportionalTo
Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so when one changes, the other changes by a fixed multiplicative factor.
-
B.
hasProportion
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified ratio, fraction, or relative share to another entity or whole.
-
C.
proportionalTo
Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so changes in one are directly reflected by proportional changes in the other.
-
D.
inverselyProportionalTo
Indicates that as the value of one quantity increases, the value of the other quantity decreases in such a way that their product remains constant.
-
E.
isQuotientOf
Indicates that one quantity is the result of dividing another quantity by a specified divisor.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008db906c819096f3597d55d95432 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c068953968819083a94f5de3e11819 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060f25c088190b433f78553ff1d84 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0623d23448190a75cf5d802fc0a02 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:35 p.m.