Triple
T639253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fourth Party |
E16694
|
entity |
| Predicate | parliamentaryGroupType |
P18382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | informal faction |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: informal faction | Statement: [Fourth Party, parliamentaryGroupType, informal faction]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parliamentaryGroupType Context triple: [Fourth Party, parliamentaryGroupType, informal faction]
-
A.
parliamentaryGroup
Indicates that an entity is a parliamentary group (or caucus) with which another political actor, such as a legislator or party, is affiliated or associated.
-
B.
typeOfParliamentaryBody
Indicates the specific kind or classification of a parliamentary body that an entity represents (e.g., lower house, upper house, unicameral chamber).
-
C.
parliamentaryHouse
Indicates that one entity functions as a parliamentary chamber or house within the legislative system of another entity.
-
D.
constituencyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of electoral or representative district to which an entity belongs or refers.
-
E.
hasLegislatureType
Indicates the specific form or system of legislature that an entity possesses or operates under.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4936be1c88190af56540324b57da7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a17b125481909a6ab53424954792 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d0629308190bcc137639567f7c2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4a1794a60819092b3dc3344426ed7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.