Triple
T6383295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ahavah Rabbah mode |
E143637
|
entity |
| Predicate | notatedAs |
P3759
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Phrygian dominant in Western music theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Phrygian dominant in Western music theory | Statement: [Ahavah Rabbah mode, notatedAs, Phrygian dominant in Western music theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notatedAs Context triple: [Ahavah Rabbah mode, notatedAs, Phrygian dominant in Western music theory]
-
A.
annotatedBy
Indicates that one entity has been marked up, commented on, or otherwise supplied with annotations by another entity.
-
B.
namedAs
Indicates that one entity is given, known by, or referred to using the name of another entity.
-
C.
observedAs
Indicates that one entity is perceived, recorded, or identified in the role, state, or form of another entity.
-
D.
notationType
chosen
Indicates the specific system or style of notation used to represent or encode something (such as music, math, or language).
-
E.
styledAs
Indicates that one entity is presented, formatted, or designed in the manner, appearance, or aesthetic of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008dac1ec81909cef8157ccd69962 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06854eb608190acb6bb4dc466f0fc |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060eff524819094cee1c70a0c1ff4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:34 p.m.