Triple
T6383284
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ahavah Rabbah mode |
E143637
|
entity |
| Predicate | musicTheoryContext |
P70300
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jewish modal system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jewish modal system | Statement: [Ahavah Rabbah mode, musicTheoryContext, Jewish modal system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: musicTheoryContext Context triple: [Ahavah Rabbah mode, musicTheoryContext, Jewish modal system]
-
A.
tonalityProgression
Indicates a change or development in musical key or tonal center over the course of a piece or passage.
-
B.
musicalSymbol
Indicates that one entity is a musical notation mark or sign associated with another entity in a musical context.
-
C.
musicElement
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a component or structural unit within a piece of music or musical composition.
-
D.
musicalFunction
Indicates the specific role or function an entity plays within a musical context, such as its harmonic, structural, or performative purpose in a piece or performance.
-
E.
musicKey
Indicates the musical key in which a piece of music, passage, or section is composed or performed.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008dac1ec81909cef8157ccd69962 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06854eb608190acb6bb4dc466f0fc |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060eff524819094cee1c70a0c1ff4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0623d23448190a75cf5d802fc0a02 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:34 p.m.