Triple
T6380453
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oye Como Va |
E143565
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRhythmicOrigin |
P70287
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cuban dance music traditions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cuban dance music traditions | Statement: [Oye Como Va, hasRhythmicOrigin, Cuban dance music traditions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRhythmicOrigin Context triple: [Oye Como Va, hasRhythmicOrigin, Cuban dance music traditions]
-
A.
hasRhythmicStyle
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
-
B.
hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
-
C.
hasMainRiff
Indicates that one musical piece, section, or track features another musical phrase or pattern as its primary recurring riff.
-
D.
hasRhythmSection
Indicates that an entity (such as a musical group or piece) includes or is associated with a rhythm section component.
-
E.
hasOffbeatStyle
Indicates that an entity exhibits an unconventional, quirky, or nontraditional style or manner.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008d9f4348190ab598a2913259a1c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0685265208190b2204bd4abff2668 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060eff524819094cee1c70a0c1ff4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0623d23448190a75cf5d802fc0a02 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:33 p.m.