Triple

T6350599
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Powell v. Alabama E142858 entity
Predicate precedentFor P3138 FINISHED
Object Betts v. Brady E57400 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Betts v. Brady | Statement: [Powell v. Alabama, precedentFor, Betts v. Brady]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Betts v. Brady
Context triple: [Powell v. Alabama, precedentFor, Betts v. Brady]
  • A. Betts v. Brady chosen
    Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
  • B. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • C. Gebhart v. Belton
    Gebhart v. Belton was a landmark Delaware school segregation case whose rulings in favor of Black students became one of the four consolidated cases decided in Brown v. Board of Education, contributing to the Supreme Court’s rejection of “separate but equal” in public education.
  • D. Nixon v. Condon
    Nixon v. Condon is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas’s delegation of authority to the Democratic Party to exclude Black voters from primary elections as unconstitutional state action under the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008d6dcbc8190aa1c2f1fd8916b42 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c067dc2790819084aaf7067dc25733 completed March 22, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c604546ed08190bb1c89bc5461f5cd completed March 27, 2026, 4:15 a.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:31 p.m.